Most people are familiar with the apostrophe’s two primary uses: possessives and contractions.
To make a noun possessive, we add apostrophe-S. “The llama’s teeth” means the llama possesses the
teeth. To make a contraction, we show which letters have been removed by replacing them
with an apostrophe. “The llama’s been fed,” means the llama has been fed.
But those two situations overlap and resemble so many other situations that
even conscientious and knowledgeable writers sometimes get mixed up. In fact, most apostrophe
errors come from trying to implement the right convention in the wrong situation.
Probably the most common example of this is the word “its.”
If we had a sentence like, “Its showing its teeth,” which “its” would need an apostrophe?
Well, that first one seems like a contraction for “it is.”
And it is! We’ve taken out a letter, and we show that with the apostrophe.
The second one looks like a possessive. And it is! The “it” possesses the teeth,
so adding apostrophe-S seems logical. That’s the problem: the right logic in the wrong situation.
We actually don’t use an apostrophe, and here’s why. The apostrophe-S rule is only for nouns,
like “llama,” not for pronouns, which are words that stand in for nouns: he, she,
they, it. Instead, we have special pronouns that show possession. We would say his teeth,
her teeth, their teeth. We don’t use apostrophes for any of those words,
not even the one that ends in S. Hi’s teeth? He’s teeth? No. His teeth. For the same reason,
we don’t use any apostrophe for the possessive pronoun we need in our example, “its.” Its teeth.
This confusion comes up often when we’re dealing with plurals, since they also require adding an S.
For example, what happens if we want to make a word plural and possessive. What if something
belongs to more than one llama? Well, rather than adding apostrophe-S, we add S-apostrophe:
the llamas’ field, the llamas’ fence, the llamas’ protective instincts. The one S serves a kind of
double function, showing both pluralization and, along with the apostrophe, possession.
That fluidity can make it easy to get confused – especially with situations
where the plurals seem unconventional. For example, what if your last name is Jones,
and you want to send a holiday card from your whole family. The name already looks plural,
so how do you pluralize it? Add an apostrophe? Well, no. It’s not possessive and it’s not a
contraction, so the apostrophe doesn’t figure in. Like usual, we just add and S, or in this
case (as with most words that already end in S), we add ES. The Joneses. No apostrophe needed.
But even this rule has exceptions. One example would be “straight A’s,” as in,
“Next year I’m going to get straight A’s.” It’s a plural, so we just add S, right? Well,
look what happens. It makes a word that holds an alternate meaning: “as.” That’s
confusing to readers. Straight as? Straight as … what? We alleviate that confusion by adding
an apostrophe. A’s. That is, as Oakland baseball fans know, the correct convention for this plural.
That’s a pretty rare situation, but a pretty common purpose for the apostrophe:
to alleviate confusion by distinguishing word forms that sound the same. They’re
writing. Their writing. The words sound exactly the same, ‘but the apostrophe lets
us know which one we’re dealing with, just as it does with “it’s” and “its.”
Really want to be a stickler? Make sure your apostrophe is curved. The vertical version is
a catchall mark invented to reduce the number of keys on a typewriter, and usually we save it for
measurements such as feet and inches, or minutes and seconds. And make sure your apostrophe faces
left, not right, even if it comes at the beginning of a contraction, like ’twas. The one that faces
right is an opening single quotation mark (a topic we’ll cover in another video). But if
we’re honest, those are conventions that even most sticklers overlook – and ones that possibly belong
to the realm of typography more than grammar. It just goes to show the minute differences and
deep similarities that make the apostrophe an especially tricky piece of punctuation.