Welcome to our first monthly instalment of the FT's new
foreign policy and defence vlog.
And I'm just back from a visit to US Space Command
in Colorado.
That's the new combatant command that
was re-established late last year after a 17-year hiatus,
and which now sees space, according
to a strategy document out last month,
as a distinct war-fighting domain.
Yep, that means war in space.
The new line of effort has even spawned
a new branch of the military to match, US Space Force.
For now it only has 90 people working for it
but that's set to rise to 2,400 soon, and with more to come.
It's already been ridiculed by some.
There's even a new TV sitcom sending up
the whole enterprise.
And US military officials laugh openly
about whether people working for Space Force
might one day become known as space warriors or even
space men and space women.
But the militarisation of space is deadly serious.
I caught up with Brigadier General Shawn
Bratton, who's deputy director of operations at US Space
Command.
He's focused on everything, including jammers and laser
capabilities, right the way up to the potential
for space-on-space weapons.
Not only did he tell me he binge-watched
all of Space Force in one night, but that he's
come to the conclusion that what China
is up to in space, what he calls ambiguity,
can mean only one thing.
I think China is developing weapons in space.
They're moving in that direction.
They see it as an area where they can compete with us.
And should we go to conflict where they would aggressively
come after us, I think for US Space Command,
our responsibility is to be able to defend
against those threats.
US simulations of large-scale conflict
already show battles quickly ascending into space.
And US Space Command is now working
on what a definition of deterrence might look like.
The 1967 Outer Space Treaty bans nuclear weapons in space,
but it doesn't mean that all weapons will be absent.
I asked Professor Joan Johnson-Freese, a space expert
at the Naval War College, just how aggressive US moves
in space might look to China.
We worry about ambiguous Chinese technology.
They worry about ambiguous US technology.
And that gets both countries into a classic security dilemma
of continually ratcheting up their technology in potentially
counterproductive terms.
Dean Cheng, an expert in China's space ambitions,
told me China's real target is in the geosynchronous orbit,
way up high.
Geosynchronous is where is the truly valuable real estate.
It's where you have key weather satellites,
it's where you have key communications satellites.
And perhaps most worryingly, it's
where you have a lot of the nuclear command and control
missile launch detection, nuclear detonation detection
satellites.
Those are all out of geosynchronous.
So the fact that the Chinese tested a anti-satellite weapon
designed to go all the way out there
is notable for a number of reasons,
not just because of the potential targets,
but because no other country, not the United States,
not the Soviet Union, not Russia,
has tested a weapon designed for that part
of the orbital regime.
Despite America's overwhelming dominance in
and reliance on space, he claims the US is now playing catch-up
to China and Russia when it comes
to readying for the prospect of conflict in space.
Chinese created their version of a Space Force,
called the PLA Strategic Support Force, at the end of 2015.
The Russians created an aerospace force, also in 2015.
So the Russians and Chinese have actually
had a space service, if you will, in place for five years.
US Space Force had no input into the production of the Netflix
show, Space Force, but they told me that any programme that
opened up conversation about Space Force and its mission,
it saw as a worthwhile endeavour.
It's only recently struck upon its new motto, semper supra.
That means, always above.
And that certainly shows you where US ambition in space
is headed.