The lost technologies of ancient gods...
Traces of tools with unknown origins... Origins that cannot be comprehended even by a certified locksmith...
armed with his trusty Bosch cordless drill!
Do you really think there is anything new in this kind of statement?
Forget about it. Certain "out-of-place artifacts" have been generating "fairy tales"
for more than a hundred years now.
So, what exactly does "out-of-place artifact" mean, anyway?
Well, these are such archeological finds that, allegedly, prove that
ancient history was quite a bit different from what "we used to think"... Why?
Since such "advanced" cool stuff couldn't be produced by those degenerates -
yeah, you know, ancient Egyptians, Sumerians, Mayans.
This is considering their laughable level of technological advancement
that "official" historians are rubbing your face in.
This kind of rim? With no welding?!
Well, I am sorry, but who exactly did a wheel alignment for them? Hmm?
Perfect symmetry! And proportions?
I say - a snug fit inside Pythagorean pentacle. Hmm...
I am wondering where they downloaded 3D-Model for its tip?
And what about a wooden handle for it? eBay?
A good example of such an artifact is the so-called "Core Sample No. 7"
Pyramidiots are especially thrilled by it.
A red granite cylinder that was found in Giza more than a hundred years ago
by a famous Egyptologist - sir Flinders Petrie.
Where do these Core Samples come from exactly?
Expert archeologists believe that they occur if the stone is drilled
with a tube or pipe while adding some abrasive.
It gradually drills into a stone while producing a circular notch with a core in the middle.
When the drill job is finished, the core is knocked out by a wedge and thrown away.
So, to be clear, it's nothing more than just industrial waste.
A significant quantity of such core samples are constantly discovered by archeologists.
For example, here.
These were found by Russian archeologists who work on the excavation
of an ancient workshop in Egypt (specific location: Kom-Tuman).
So what was the purpose of all this drilling?
In the case of this ancient workshop,
core samples were left behind after the stone vases cavity was drilled out.
A vase? Was there anything else?
Yes! For example, that's how the hubs for gate axis were produced in Egyptian temples.
Also, the same approach was used for sarcophagi groove drilling as well as "eyes" in statues.
But what kind of material is needed to drill a stone?
It most certainly must be a very hard drill. Diamond? Or maybe Tungsten carbide?
In fact, it's not really a necessity, as in this case we use additional abrasive.
Such as silica sand or corundum.
The drill bit itself can be made of some soft metal like copper.
You see, it's not the copper that drills but the abrasive particles.
Jolly good but has someone proved this?
Actually, yes... and, repeatedly.
Similar experiments were performed by Egyptologist - Denys Stocks
and Russian experimentalist - Nikolay Vasyutin.
Heck, even I did personally!
Also, our channel's pride and joy -
Olga Vdovina - she was able to achieve this by using a cow bone.
So, no miracles here.
Exactly, no miracles. Your primitive "drilling" simply cannot repeat
a famous "Core Samples No. 7"!
What is so special about the renowned "Core Sample No. 7"?
From the first glance - nothing in particular.
But Flinders Petrie managed to convince himself, and others, that there is something special about it.
The scientist recognized spiral thread grooves on its surface.
These thread grooves were continuous for a few full turns around the core sample.
At the same time, according to Petrie, the thread step is always the same -
2.5mm with a deviation of no more than 0.25mm.
His conclusion was that these grooves were left by a really tough tool.
Some sort of a chisel capable of carving granite at amazing speed.
Well, frankly, there are no such chisels (capable of carving 2.5mm of granite in a single turn)
available at our disposal even in the 21st century.
Since then, Core Sample No.7 was and is actively used by quasi-scientists.
Apparently, this is the direct proof that Ancient Egypt had
much more advanced technology than we do today.
Sample No.7 was taken on board by both western and eastern Pyramidiots.
PERFECT GROOVES!
some of the hardest materials on earth
except that they’re conic and the feature grooves that so far nobody has explained and reproduced
it had a spiral groove
spiral groove that goes around core number seven
each groove means that the penetration rate was likely 2-3 mm per revolution
that is an impossible feed rate
it seems like a rough ready process to pop a hole in granite as fast as you can
the penetration rate is 500 times more efficient than a 21st century drill
There are many videos online dedicated to "Ancient Hi-Tech".
Usually, there are some smart looking experts debating
how exactly the speedy granite drilling was performed.
Maybe, some high-power ultrasound emitter? Hypervortex fieldrotor?
Oh, come on... no way.
Neutron plasma cutter?
Oh, really... Ah... This sounds very likely.
This really is the elephant in the room when it comes to evidence for ancient high technology
…the technology is far more advanced that we have
lots of evidence of lost ancient high technology
the evidence for the high technology
But what if the grooves are not perfect?
Oh, don't be silly, my boy.
These "Perfect Grooves" are constantly mentioned in the comments section of our videos.
Also, our friends are very often blocked when they try to leave comments and share links
to our experiments under various "Ancient High-Tech" type youtube channels.
Shall we try to give this Core Sample No.7 a careful look?
You bloody genius!
The only problem is that "Core Sample No.7"
is currently stored in Petrie's Museum in London.
Behind some glass too.
So not so easy for the random enthusiast to take a close look at.
That was mainly the reason why all stories about this ”unbelievable" core sample
were supported by Petrie's references alone.
It's hard to believe that no one attempted to verify that
the famous egyptologist's findings were indeed accurate.
The only kind of proof supplied was usually the Core samples photo alone.
And yes, indeed, you could just about see some grooves in it.
No! you forgot about Christopher Dunn's research!
Oh right, how could I?
A famous figure in alternative history groups,
an engineer and independent researcher Christopher Dunn
has personally examined a well-known artifact (in 1999)
and was convinced of the authenticity of Petrie's findings.
At least that's what he said.
Why would an honest to God researcher be lying?
Mr. Dunn examined the core sample under a microscope.
Yes, it's a clear fact.
Also, he wrapped a thread around the core sample
and it was indeed following spiral grooves.
It is time for you, officials, to accept your defeat!
Nevertheless, Mr.Dunn also discovered that the spiral grooves have some ruptures.
The same was mentioned by Flinders Petrie himself.
It was only possible to track 5 full turns around the core sample.
Expectedly enough, Christopher Dunn wanted more proof.
So in the year 2003, he managed to get a latex mold of the Core No.7.
Then the mold was used to make a swept shape of the sample.
And, again, Mr.Dunn was convinced that spiral grooves cover the entire core sample.
With periodical ruptures along the way.
It's proof, isn't it? What else do you actually require?
Let's be honest, if you look, carefully, at the latex mold photo...
It's not exactly convincing, is it?
Do you really recognize a pattern in this chaos?
And how about the thread trick?
Nikolay Vasyutin attempted to use the core sample from his own experiment to recreate it.
Look, the thread spirals around the core sample in a clockwise direction.
And now, anticlockwise.
It seems that the thread only obeys the will of the one holding it
and not the direction of grooves.
It would be sensible to take hi-res photos
and use them to produce a panoramic composite of the core sample.
This kind of composite would clearly show what grooves are we dealing with.
Are they spiral, ring, or some other type?
Luckily, we were able to do so.
On the 2nd of March (2020) I got a wonderful birthday present from our British friends.
High-resolution photos of Core Sample No.7 - from all angles.
These were then used to produce a 360-degree panoramic composite.
The very first thing we did
was to compare the panoramic composite of Core Sample No.7
with the resulted core samples of other modern experiments.
I have to officially admit... The comparison showed that so far we have
not been able to achieve the level of quality available in Ancient Egypt.
Just look at it yourself... Here is our sample and here is the ancient one.
The difference is obvious... The ancient core sample has much sharper,
smoother and deeper grooves.
You see?!
Modern technologies are clearly far behind the ancient craftsmanship!
And maybe we will never even reach them.
Hahahaha! The downfall of official science!
Oh, blimey... I got it all mixed up.
It's the other way around.
Here is the ancient core sample and this one is a modern one.
Yes, that's right, the core sample, produced by Nikolay Vasyutin in 2010,
is much nicer than the famous Core Sample No.7.
And what about the statements made by sir Flinders Petrie?
Let's revisit them:
- Core Sample grooves form spiral threads
- These spiral threads are continuous for at least several full revolutions
- The thread step is always 2.5mm wide with a deviation of no more than 0.25mm
Let's review each statement separately. Starting with the thread step.
The core sample described by sir Filnders Petrie
should probably look something like this:..
While the real Core Sample No.7’s surface looks like this.
The ruler is included for a scale indication.
Maybe there is something wrong with my eyes
but it looks like the distance between grooves vary from 1 to more than 2 mm.
It fluctuates from 2 to even 3 times line to line...!
Where is this "perfectly aligned" thread with a constant step
indicated by sir Filnders Petrie? Quite a mystery.
Now let's have a look at how continuous the spiral threads are.
A rather simple inspection is enough to see
that they overlap, merge and split. Again and again.
Nah, you see... It was a rather powerful tool but... an unstable one too.
So Atlantean craftman's hands were shaking while clutching the laser drill.
That's exactly what Christopher Dunn writes about.
Yes, both sir Flinders Petrie and Christopher Dunn,
were trying to blame the tool's lack of stability.
Naming it as a cause for many flaws that can be observed in the thread...
but what kind of instability could split it that much?
Finally, how about the spiral grooves?
Well, It is required to perform a tracing exercise
and draw the grooves along the surface of the core sample.
It was performed by our fellow geologist - Pavel Selivanov.
And here is the result:
And to simplify even more:
Let’s be honest, it's not a trivial task - to locate continuous spiral threads
with a stable step and other characteristics
mentioned by sir Flinders Petrie while looking at it.
All visible lines break, interrupt and split.
One way or the other. And, please, do take this into consideration -
it was clearly indicated that we should expect to see spiral threads
that are beautifully smooth.
Is there anyone who can observe this here?
Me, personally, no... maybe I am looking at it wrong.
Christopher Dunn, Brian Foerster and other alternative historians!
Are you seriously saying that you can see perfectly smooth
spiral threads in this photo?
May we kindly suggest for one to pay a visit to one's optician?
How exactly Christopher Dunn was able to wrap a thread around THIS?
And what sir Flinders Petrie measured?
Frankly, it's not entirely clear what Pyramidiots are still excited about?
Some magic drill capable of carving 2mm of granite in a single turn.
All these questions are rhetorical.
Well, let's clarify where these grooves in the sample core really come from?
The thing is, these grooves have nothing to do with the drilling speed itself.
Here is what happens...
Abrasive material particles fall into the gap between the drill bit and the core sample.
Then the pressure is applied on them and first tiny grooves are formed.
These are then straight away filled with more abrasive particles and widened.
If the grade of abrasive material is low (meaning a relatively small number of abrasive particles),
these will continue to fill the nearest grooves.
This is how you get a series of grooves that are located
at a relatively equal distance from each other.
All these statements are verified by our own practical experiments.
If the amount and the grade of abrasive material are kept high at all times -
you will not get any grooves at all.
So both the core sample and walls of the drill hole stay smooth.
Well, you have to admit - yet another Pyramidiot's fetish turned out to be a myth.
And why were we misinformed for more than 100 years on this topic?
Conspiracy! Arranged by archaeologists?
No, I think the root-cause is rather different.
There is a number of factors that probably gave birth to this myth:
- Difficulties with the access to the artifact
- We tend to believe any information presented by a confident narrator's voice
- Sir Flinders Petrie’s authority...
but we shouldn't forget that even the best scientists still make mistakes
The famous myth of "Core Sample No.7"
couldn't pass even the simplest of tests. I will repeat again:
- Core Sample grooves do not form spiral threads
- These spiral threads are not continuous. They break, interrupt and split.
- The distance between grooves fluctuates up-to 3 times line to line.
Modern experiments performed by our team produced similarly looking core samples.
The conclusion is - all extraordinary statements must be checked and re-checked.
Even if they are made by such an outstanding
and respectable scientist as sir Flinders Petrie.
My dear friends, your comments, Patreon's subscription and likes are very much appreciated.
I would like to express my gratitude to:
- Vladislav Dragunov, for his video editing skills
- Nikolai Vasyutin and Olga Vdovina for all the knowledge and experience shared with us
- George Sokolov, for his help with organization of photo shooting
- Pavel Selivanov for tracing analysis
- Timur Nizov for his animation skills
- special thanks to the Petrie's Museum for supporting our project
Yours - Alexander Sokolov.
The downfall of official science!
turn off...